To use Set4 Code Comments, you should:
We recommend that you first start by looking at the drawing without using AI, and only entering the AI review phase later. Reviewers must check AI’s work, and understanding the drawing is necessary to do this.
Secondly, reviewers are likely to need to speak with applicants about the plan later, and without good knowledge of the drawings, this is hard.
Yes, but not perfectly.
In set4’s research, we have found that AI can predict around 80-90% of the comments left by plan reviewers in jurisdictions.
AI is weak at reading construction symbols and measuring distances and layouts (unless they are dimensioned).
Therefore, pay close attention to how the AI is reading the plan’s non-textual information. It is more likely to make mistakes with purely visual or spatial information.
Each jurisdiction does read the code differently. Set4 offers an AI training service where we train AI on your historic comments, and ensure the AI is better at reading the code like your team.
The Issues table is the source of AI’s review of codes. It contains a list of different AI suggested comments.
Set4 is able to train AI on your historic comments in your jurisdictions. Reach out to us in order to do this.
Issues are grouped into different categories: